top of page
Writer's pictureGabriel Whitley

Indianapolis City Councilman Jesse Brown Under Fire for Suggesting Trump Should Be Assassinated

Indianapolis – Controversy is swirling around Indianapolis City Councilman Jesse Brown after a recent post on X (formerly known as Twitter) in which Brown appeared to suggest that former President Donald Trump should be assassinated. The post has ignited outrage among conservatives, including Trump supporters, who view the comment as both irresponsible and dangerous in light of two recent assassination attempts against Trump.


In his post, Brown wrote, *“I don't think assassination is ever morally acceptable. Same with storming the capitol. Same with setting up a gibbet and trying to hang Mike Pence. But when your boy tells his brownshirts to ‘stand back and stand by’ and then uses them to attack Congress, let's get real here.”*


While Brown seems to express a general opposition to political violence, his remarks have been interpreted by many as insinuating that such actions against Trump might be justifiable in the context of the former president's rhetoric and the events surrounding January 6, 2021.


Brown's critics were quick to respond. Indiana Republicans and local political figures have condemned his comments, with some calling for his resignation from the city council. “This type of rhetoric is beyond the pale,” said Republican State Senator Jim Merritt. “We’ve already seen the consequences of political violence in this country, and for an elected official to make a statement like this is incredibly dangerous.”


The timing of Brown’s remarks has further fueled the backlash. President Trump has reportedly survived two recent assassination attempts, heightening concerns over safety and security. In light of these incidents, Brown’s critics argue that his words are not only reckless but also contribute to a toxic political climate that normalizes violence.


Democrats in Indianapolis have been largely silent on the issue, though a few have called the post a “poorly worded” comment that does not reflect Brown’s actual stance on violence. However, some progressives have defended Brown, arguing that his statement was taken out of context and that he was merely pointing out the dangers posed by Trump’s actions.


Political commentators have weighed in, with some pointing out that Brown’s use of the term “brownshirts” – a reference to the paramilitary organization of Nazi Germany – only served to inflame tensions. In particular, Trump supporters feel that such language demonizes them and paints all conservatives as extremists.


Jesse Brown, who represents a predominantly liberal district in Indianapolis, has yet to offer a formal apology, though he issued a follow-up post clarifying his position. “Violence is never the answer, and I stand by that. My post was intended to highlight the hypocrisy in defending violent actions while condemning others. I understand that my words have been interpreted in a way I did not intend, and for that, I apologize to anyone who felt threatened.”


Despite the apology, many in Indianapolis are calling for further action, including censure or removal from office. Brown’s future on the council is now uncertain, as his comments have not only alienated Republicans but have also left some Democrats questioning his judgment.


This latest controversy comes at a time of increased political polarization in Indianapolis and across the nation. As the 2024 elections approach, incidents like this only serve to deepen the divide between political factions, with both sides accusing each other of inciting violence.


Whether Jesse Brown’s career will survive this firestorm remains to be seen, but one thing is certain – his comments have sparked a heated debate on the boundaries of political discourse in an increasingly volatile environment.


---

This developing story will be updated as more information becomes available.

Comentários


bottom of page