top of page
Gregg Smith

Fact Checking the Indy Star: Trump’s Comments About Kamala Harris at 'Sorority Party’

Wed Sep 11 2024 11:27:44


Indianapolis, Indiana: In a recent article by Indy Star titled “Trump said Harris was at a 'sorority party.' Indy speaking engagement wasn’t a party,” the publication attempts to fact-check Donald Trump’s comments made during a Republican presidential debate. Trump accused Vice President Kamala Harris of skipping an important address by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu because she was attending a “sorority party” in Indianapolis. He cited this as an example of her alleged disdain for Israel.


The event that Trump referred to was the “Grand Boule,” a convention held by Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc., one of the nation’s largest historically Black sororities. The event took place from July 23 to July 28 at the Indiana Convention Center, attracting about 6,000 attendees. The sorority, founded in 1920, focuses on promoting education, addressing health disparities, and advocating for social, health, and economic justice for women, particularly in the African-American community.


In its article, Indy Star emphasized that the event was not a “party” in the traditional sense but rather a professional gathering that involved important discussions on social justice, health, and economic issues. They sought to discredit Trump’s characterization of the event as a “sorority party,” framing it as an inaccurate description of a serious, service-oriented convention.


While Indy Star downplays Trump’s description, the reality is that the event, while serious in purpose, was indeed part of a sorority’s annual convention, which many may refer to colloquially as a “party.” Zeta Phi Beta’s convention, like many sorority and fraternity events, serves dual purposes: fostering professional development and camaraderie while also celebrating the culture and community of the organization. Events like this often include social gatherings, banquets, and other celebratory elements alongside their more formal programs.

The title of the event, the "Grand Boule," and its associated activities, do give it a festive and celebratory atmosphere, even if the purpose extends beyond mere socializing. In this regard, Trump’s characterization wasn’t entirely off-base, as sorority conventions are, in fact, filled with both important service activities and elements of celebration that one might colloquially call a "party."


What the Indy Star doesn’t fully address is whether Vice President Harris’s decision to attend the Zeta Phi Beta convention instead of the Israeli Prime Minister’s address sends a troubling message about her priorities. It’s notable that Netanyahu’s speech to Congress, an important event for U.S.-Israel relations, occurred on July 24, squarely within the time frame of Harris’s attendance at the Grand Boule. The timing and optics of the decision do lend credence to Trump’s point about Harris potentially prioritizing a sorority convention over diplomatic responsibilities.


While Indy Star attempted to deflect Trump’s criticism by focusing on the semantics of what constitutes a “party,” they failed to address the larger and more important point: the potential diplomatic implications of Harris’s scheduling choices. Given her role as Vice President and her need to balance a range of responsibilities, skipping Netanyahu’s address could be perceived as a snub, regardless of the reason.


In conclusion, Indy Star’s attempt to fact-check Trump’s comments falls short by focusing too heavily on dismissing the term “party” and ignoring the broader political context. While the event was serious in purpose, it was also a celebration of Zeta Phi Beta’s achievements and community. Therefore, calling it a "sorority party" is not entirely inaccurate, though it might have been an oversimplification.

Trump’s comments about Harris’s actions, while provocative, raise legitimate questions about the optics and priorities of a Vice President skipping an important diplomatic event for a social gathering, even if it was for a good cause. By dismissing these concerns, Indy Star missed an opportunity to provide a more nuanced analysis of the situation

Comments


bottom of page